In the wizarding world, bloodline, often referred to as blood status, is a concept that classifies witches and wizards based on their immediate ancestry. It denotes whether an individual descends from magical, non-magical (Muggle), or mixed parentage. This classification is a central element of societal structure and prejudice, forming the ideological basis for major conflicts, most notably the two Wizarding Wars led by Lord Voldemort. While blood status has no bearing on a person's magical ability, the belief in “blood purity” has deeply influenced wizarding history, politics, and social hierarchy for centuries.
The wizarding society is primarily divided into several distinct blood statuses, each with its own social standing and connotations.
The core of Lord Voldemort's ideology and the platform of his Death Eaters was the supremacy of pure-bloods. This belief system promoted the subjugation and eradication of Muggle-borns and the domination of the Muggle world. Families like the Weasleys, who were pure-bloods but did not share these prejudiced views, were labeled “blood traitors.” This bigotry fueled the creation of discriminatory laws and institutions, culminating in the witch hunts conducted by the Ministry of Magic under Voldemort's control.
While blood status does not determine magical power, certain rare magical abilities are known to be passed down through specific family bloodlines.
Historically, bloodline has been tied to power, wealth, and influence in the wizarding world. The “Ancient and Most Noble Houses,” such as the House of Black, were old pure-blood families who held considerable social sway and often possessed ancestral homes, vaults at Gringotts, and significant political power within the Wizengamot.
J.K. Rowling has stated in interviews that the obsession with blood purity in the wizarding world was a deliberate allegory for the racial and ethnic supremacist ideologies of regimes like the Nazis. The terminology used by Death Eaters, such as “pure-blood,” “half-blood,” and the slur `Mudblood`, directly mirrors the discriminatory language used to enforce such doctrines.